Chromosomal Abnormalities:
Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13
Introduction
Trisomy 18 and Trisomy 13 are the
only two live born trisomies apart from trisomy 21 (Down syndrome). These
trisomy disorders tend to have much more severe clinical manifestations than
trisomy 21, and only rarely do affected infants survive to one year of life.
Mean survival time (MST) for trisomy 18 is 14.5 days, and MST for trisomy 13 is
7 days (Rasmussen et al., 2003;
Duarte et al., 2004). A
characteristic constellation of clinical findings that suggest a specific
diagnosis exist for both trisomies 13 and 18, with cardiac defects typically
being more severe in trisomy 13. Since some of these patients may be mosaics
for the trisomy cell line, a variety of phenotypic expression is possible.
Trisomy 18
Epidemiology
Trisomy 18, or
Edwards Syndrome, is the second most common trisomy behind Down syndrome. This
syndrome has an incidence of between 1 in 3000 and 1 in 8000, with a 3:1
Female:Male predominance. 90% of cases of trisomy 18 are due to maternal
nondysjunction. 10% of cases are due to mosaicism, and less than 1% of cases
are due to a translocation.
Clinical Diagnosis
Trisomy 18 typically
presents with some combination of the following features:
Trisomy 18 is confirmed by karyotype with FISH analysis.
Prognosis
Trisomy 18 is associated with severe mental retardation and
severe failure to thrive. 50% of patients die by one week of life, and 90% of
patients die by one year of life.
Trisomy 13
Trisomy 13, or Patio
syndrome, is the least common of the live-born trisomy disorders, with an
incidence of 1 in 5000 to 1 in 2,000 live births. There is an equal
distribution between affected males and affected females. 75% of trisomy 13
cases are due to maternal nondisjunction, 20% of cases are due to a
translocation, and 5% of cases are due to mosaicism. The major midline
dysmorphic features of trisomy 13 are due to a defect in the fusion of the
midline prechordial mesoderm in the first three weeks of gestation. Trisomy 13
tends to present with more severe craniofacial and midline defects than are
found in Trisomy 18 or 21. Trisomy 13 traditionally presents with some
combination of the following clinical features:
Trisomy 13 is confirmed by karyotype with FISH analysis.
Prognosis
The prognosis of patients diagnosed with Trisomy 13 remains
poor. 85% of Trisomy 13 newborns die before reaching one year of age, and only
six cases have been described in the literature as surviving past the age of 10
years (Iliopoulos et al.). 44% of
these patients die within 1 month, and > 70% die within one year. Iliopoulos
et al. have hypothesized that factors
associated with longer survival largely pertain to the absence of cardiac
abnormalities and holoprosencephaly; Rasmussen et al. have also demonstrated that the general rate of survival is
higher for female Trisomy 13 patients when compared with males.
Management
The vast majority
(98%) of pregnancies diagnosed with trisomies 13 and 18 have traditionally been
terminated (Gessner et al., 2003),
but there has recently been an increase in the number of families who decide to
continue with the pregnancy. Sibiude et
al. recently described the perinatal care of 34 fetuses diagnosed with
trisomies 13 and 18 in utero. Of
these, 14 pregnancies (41%) were continued, with four eventually being
delivered alive; only two of these neonates survived long enough (10 and 11
days) to receive intensive care in the neonatal unit.
Sibiude et al. emphasized that a highly
individualized, interdisciplinary approach should be utilized with families who
have been diagnosed with a pregnancy carrying trisomy 13 or trisomy 18. Some
families, for example, opted to continue with routine prenatal care, whereas
others desire a more customized approach involving more frequent ultrasound
surveillance of the pregnancy. Those patients who continued with pregnancies
also expressed a desire to hear the fetal heart during subsequent prenatal
visits. The majority of families who underwent a live birth expressed a to see
the newborn alive, albeit briefly.
It is important to
determine the level of postpartum intervention that is desired by parents
following delivery; Sibiude et al.
encourage using prenatal visits to discuss both the birthing process and likely
appearance of the child with parents. Vaginal deliveries with intermittent
monitoring of fetal heart rates are preferred, as this mode of delivery allows
for immediate contact between the parents and child. Cesarean sections are
strongly discouraged, as they are of little benefit to both the neonate and
mother, with exceptions being made for scenarios in which an obstetric
indication for a Cesarean section is present. Unstable live deliveries should
largely be provided comfort care, such as oxygen and analgesia. Neonates who
are stable following intensive care should be discharged home with the parents
and a full plan for support in place.
Finally, an
interdisciplinary approach should be utilized in these situations, with support
provided by genetic counselors, pediatric cardiologists, obstetricians, and
clinical geneticists.
References: